Case #1 – Motions Appeal Results in Favorable DUI Case Outcome in Cherokee County State Court

Description: After investigating our client’s case, we found that her drunk driving arrest was illegal. We filed a pre-trial motion to have the arrest thrown out; however, the judge denied our motion. Believing that a mistake was made, we appealed this decision and the Georgia Court of Appeals granted our appeal. Because the original ruling was overturned, all of the evidence obtained as the result of our client’s arrest—including her breathalyzer results—were excluded and her DUI was dismissed, saving our client’s job in the process.

Outcome: DUI dismissed after appeal


Case #2 – Client Acquitted of DUI in Jury Trial in Atlanta

Description: Our client—a man with a history of psychiatric issues—went out with a neighbor for pizza and beer after working all day. While our client only had a beer and a half, he also took a number of prescriptions for his bipolar disorder, including Lithium, Halcion, and Paxil, around the time that he was drinking. Instead of going home after going out with his neighbor, our client instead decided to go to his girlfriend’s apartment, taking her car, which was left at his condo.

When he reached the gate of his girlfriend’s condo, he found that the access code didn’t work. Frustrated, he rammed the metal gate. When the vehicle became wedged in the gate, he tried to dislodge it by putting the car in reverse, then drive, etc. Eventually, he was able to dislodge the vehicle when the front bumper was detached; however, he awakened most of the other condo occupants in the process of dragging the gate across the asphault.

Our client then left the scene and ran a red light, almost striking a police car that had been dispatched to the scene of the gate crashing. The officer pulled our client over, who appeared to be unstable at the scene and refused to take any roadside breathalyzer tests.

At trial, the officer testified that our client smelled of alcohol and seemed to be wasted. Upon cross examination, we established that the arresting officer had no “drug recognition expert” training and that he never asked our client if he was taking prescription medication. We then called our client’s girlfriend, neighbor, and a doctor to the stand. By showing that our client was not impaired by alcohol due to having less than two regular-sized beers all day, but rather was impaired by prescription medication, we were able to argue that our client NOT GUILTY of DUI-alcohol (as accused) but was being affected by his prescription drugs. He was not accused of DUI-drugs.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI-alcohol after a three-hour deliberation in Atlanta traffic court.

Case #3 Charged with DUI After Hitting a Telephone Pole in Atlanta DUI Court

Description: After hitting a telephone pole near downtown Atlanta, our client and a female who was unconscious and still inside the cab of the small pickup sustained serious injuries. The fire department and an ambulance arrived first, followed shortly by a police officer. When the officer first saw our client, he was standing next to the fire truck. The officer reported smelling alcohol on our client’s breath and asked how the accident happened; however, our client could not remember the events that led to the crash. The officer arrested our client and took him to the police station, where he blew a 0.20% on a breathalyzer.

During pre-trial motions, we argued that the officer did not have any independent witness or other credible evidence that our client was driving, other than what the ambulance driver and a bystander told him. Our motion to suppress the evidence was granted; however, it was then appealed and reversed by the prosecution but sufficient to go to trial. The appellate court found that all evidence pointing to our client was hearsay. During the non-jury trial, the prosecution brought in several witnesses; however, none had direct proof that our client was driving. The Atlanta judge, who had believed the case should have been dismissed and made that ruling, now had considered the full case and all evidence, and ruled that the State had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Outcome: Acquittal of all DUI charges

Case #4 – Underage DUI with a 0.16% BAC and Case Dismissed at Lilburn Municipal Court

Description: Our client, a 20-year-old Vanderbilt student, was at home in Gwinnett County for spring break. After going out with her friends, she accidentally drove off the road into a wooded area in the city limits of Lilburn. A former high school classmate, who lived in Lilburn, stopped and tried to help extricate the car from the muddy ditch. When the car could not be driven back onto the road, he drove the female to her perents’ home. Shortly after she arrived home, the Lilburn Police Department called and asked our client’s father to bring her back to the scene. Not knowing that he had a choice, the father drove his underage daughter to the location of her stranded vehicle. The Lilburn officer then arrested our client for failure to maintain lane and DUI.

Our client was asked to take a breathalyzer test at the Lilburn Police Department, and blew a 0.16%. Mr. Head took the DUI and failure to maintain lane case to trial, the officer testified on the prosecution’s behalf; however, because the officer did not have evidence that our client drank before the accident—rather than after—we were able to object to a number of his statements. The officer never asked the driver of the vehicle (when she returned to the location of her stranded vehicle) WHEN she had consumed the alcohol that was in her system.

Outcome: Not Guilty of all charges at a bench trial in Lilburn Municipal Court.

Case #5 Client Charged with DUI after Testing with a BAC of 0.18% at Forsyth County State Court

Description: After failing to dim his headlights and rolling through a stop sign, our client was pulled over by a Forsyth County DUI task force officer. Our client took the implied consent breathalyzer test, but requested an independent blood test at Northside Hospital, located approximately 30 minutes from the Forsyth County jail. The officer refused to accommodate his request, saying our client needed to choose a closer facility. Despite the fact that our client was familiar with Northside Hospital, and wanted to obtain his independent blood test at this facility, he was taken to the small hospital in Cumming for his blood test, where the reading showed a 0.18% BAC.

Because his request for being taken to Northside was denied, Mr. Head filed a motion to exclude the State breath test results since our client was denied his request to go to a medical setting of his own choosing. This motion was denied by the trial judge in Forsyth County State Court, and Mr. Head immediately appealed this court ruling. The Court of Appeals reversed the Forsyth County judge’s ruling, stating that there was no reason why our client’s request to be transported to Northside Hospital should not have been honored. Without this breath test evidence, the prosecution dropped the DUI charge and allowed our client plead to a lesser offense. The client was then able to keep his driver’s license, and avoid a DUI conviction.

Outcome: DUI dismissed in exchange for a reduced charge

Case #6 – Client Pulled over for DUI Due to Lipstick Application in Clayton County State Court

Description: After a hard first day at her new job, our client picked up a six pack of beer and went to visit her brother. She drank three beers at his house in five hours, before leaving for home at midnight. While she was driving, she applied her lipstick while looking in her rear view mirror, causing her to drive too close to the vehicle in front of her as well as to cross the yellow line when driving in a curve. She was pulled over by two officers, who immediately asked her to step out of the vehicle and begin performing field sobriety tests. While the Clayton County police said she passed these tests, an Alco-sensor portable breath test detected the presence of alcohol and she was placed under arrest for drunk driving.

We entered a “not guilty” plea for our client and filed 14 separate pre-trial motions, challenging the prosecution’s evidence. Because the trial was going to take so long to begin, the prosecution reduced the DUI to reckless driving, which allowed our client to retain her full Georgia driver’s license.

Outcome: DUI dismissed for reduced charge

Case #7 – Officer Perjury in a DUI Case in Gwinnett County State Court

Description: Our client, who was from Texas was charged with drunk driving after blowing a 0.16% BAC. While he wanted to plead guilty to his charge, Mr. Head encouraged him to reconsider after explaining that the arresting officer was notorious for violating residents’ constitutional rights and lying in DUI cases. The Texas licensee was very interested in not having a conviction on his Texas driver’s license, so he hired Mr. Head to fight his DUI case. This Gwinnett County police officer claimed that there was no video of our client’s arrest, when, in fact, there was video from the scene. The officer falsified official police department records to hide the lie.

Mr. Head was able to prove not only that the officer lied under oath during our client’s Administrative License Suspension hearing, but that he also broke into the county’s records room to alter a daily log report, as to which vehicle he was assigned to drive that evening. Upon establishing the officer’s perjury and illegal actions, our client’s DUI case was dismissed. Mr. Head took this information of the officer’s perjury and falsification of records to the District Attorney. The officer later turned in his badge and gun, resigned as a Georgia law enforcement officer, and agreed to never work as a police officer again. All of his other DUI cases were dismissed due to his lack of credibility.

Outcome: All DUI charges and other charges dismissed

Case # 8 – Failure to Follow Proper Protocol Leads to DUI Dismissal in DeKalb State Court

Description: Mr. Head’s client, a skilled computer consultant, was pulled over after changing lanes to avoid a slow vehicle. The officer asked how much our client—who had been out with some coworkers and had six beers over the course of several hours—how much he had to drink. When our client responded that he hadn’t had much, the DeKalb County police officer asked him to take a portable field sobriety test. Our client then asked the officer a number of questions regarding the ramifications of taking the portable breath test and about the calibration of the unit. The DeKalb officer stated that, “nothing would happen” if he refused to take the preliminary breathalyzer and that the portable breath device only tested “positive”. Both statements were untrue, which the officer knew. The client declined to take the portable test, which he was entitled to do. But, the client told the DeKalb law enforcement officer that he would take a blood test.

The officer arrested our client for DUI, and took him to DeKalb Medical Center for the blood test. The nurse refused our client’s request for a second sample, and the police officer’s blood test showed a 0.13% BAC. The officer, who neglected to read the Miranda Warning to our client, then refused our client’s request to make a phone call. After being taken to the police station, our client was held for over 12 hours before being booked or allowed to make a call.

During the pre-trial motions, we argued that there was no probable cause for a custodial DUI arrest, since no field sobriety tests or portable breath test evidence was obtained before Mr. Head’s client was cuffed. Although Mr. Head demanded a copy of the videotape evidence (which was favorable to our client) several times, the officer did not bring it to court. At a pre-trial motion hearing, seeking to exclude the blood test, and to challenge the DUI arrest, the DUI case was “nolle prossed” (dismissed). Mr. Head’s client ended up pleading guilty to a $250 speeding ticket.

Outcome: DUI charge dismissed

Case #9 – DUI with Breathalyzer Refusal in Alpharetta Municipal Court

Description: Our client was parked on Birmingham Highway in Alpharetta, GA, when two Fulton County officers pulled over and determined she was impaired. The officers improperly administered a number of field sobriety tests and read the Implied Consent warning beforeplacing our client under arrest. During cross examination during the pre-trial hearing, the arresting officer had a difficult time explaining why our client was arrested for drunk driving. He claimed that it was partially due to her admitting to consumption of alcohol and to having an open can of beer in the car. However, after Mr. Head cross-examined the officer, it was clear that the open beer can was only discovered after the arrest, and that it was inside a closed, Styrofoam cooler.

The judge presiding over the pre-trial hearing was sitting in for a full-time judge and refused to throw out the case. However, the officer failed to appear at the trial, leading to a dismissal of the DUI. This allowed our client to avoid termination at her job and to move on from her charges.

Outcome: DUI case dismissed

Case # 10 – DUI Arrest in Sandy Springs on Georgia 400 Where the Case was Bound Over to Fulton State Court

Description: When our client was stopped on Georgia 400 for speeding, the officer suspected he was DUI and asked him to perform field sobriety tests, which the officer claimed he failed. At the police station, our client blew a 0.098% on the breathalyzer.

There was no video of our client’s arrest, so we decided to cross examine the officer by using the officer’s Intoxilyzer breath test student manual. As a result of his incorrect statements, the jury felt as though the officer misled them regarding what happened at the breathalyzer test location that occurred after arrest.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI

Case #11 – Client Acquitted After Allegedly Failing Field Sobriety Tests and Breathalyzer at Gwinnett County State Court

Description: Our client, who did not speak English very well, was stopped on 316 and asked to perform field sobriety tests, which the officer said he failed. In addition, the officer later claimed that our client pretended to blow into the breathalyzer, but never provided an adequate breath test sample.

During jury selection, we sought to select jurors who would be sympathetic of our client’s limited English proficiency. We also produced video evidence from the jail showing our client acting and walking in a normal manner. After seeing the evidence, the jury agreed that the prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI or Failure to Maintain Lane, but Guilty of Speeding

Case #12 – Client Charged with Drunk Driving after Rear Ending Police Car in DeKalb State Court

Description: Our client was traveling on Ashford Dunwoody road when she rear ended a police car. The officer suspected our client of DUI and called a more experienced officer to the scene. The second police officer administered the field sobriety tests and read her the Georgia implied consent warning. The client was confused about what the implied consent wording meant, and initially refused the breathalyzer test.

During the trial, the second officer testified that he read the implied consent warning again at the police station, and that our client then changed her mind about the test, and took the breath test. The results were well over the legal limit. What the arresting officer did not know, however, is that the testing officer at the DeKalb County jail told us that the implied consent warning was never read at the police station—meaning that the arresting officer was lying on the witness stand. After the officer was off the stand, we told the prosecutor that he should speak to the next witness, since the arresting officer’s perjury would be exposed.

Under Georgia DUI law, a person who has refused an implied consent test cannot be required to take the DUI test, unless he or she changes his or her mind, without coercion or deception, as was done in this case. When the prosecutor came back into the courtroom, he immediately dropped the  DUI if our client would plead guilty to following too closely. The client agreed to do this.

Outcome: DUI dismissed

Case #13 – Client Arrested for DUI after Previous Offenses in Cobb County State Court

Description: Our client had been arrested for two DUI offenses in the past, with one of them being reduced to reckless driving and the other DUI case resulting in his acquittal at trial. In this particular case, our client was parked in a driveway and asleep behind the wheel when two officers were called to a nearby location where a woman was locked out of her house.

The police asked our client to step out of the vehicle to perform field sobriety tests before he was arrested (and allegedly resisted arrest). At the police station, our client refused the breathalyzer. Fortunately, there was videotape evidence of the entire roadside investigation. The police video showed that our client performed well on the field sobriety tests and acted normally. The prosecution attempted to use other law enforcement officers from our client’s prior DUI cases as witnesses, but, they were not available to testify. Therefore, the jury never heard about the fact that he was a repeat DUI offender.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI

Case #14 – Out-of-State Client Charged with DUI in Roswell Municipal Court

Description: We were asked to represent a client who was visiting Atlanta from another state. After an officer caught our client urinating next to his rental car in a parking lot, he advised our client to not drive the vehicle again, due to suspected intoxication. However, once the officer left the scene, five minutes later, our client drove off and passed by the officer, who allegedly saw our client run a stop sign and change lanes without using a signal. When the officer used blue lights to pull over our client, the officer stated that the client was unsteady, had bloodshot eyes, and smelled of alcohol. After arrest, the client agreed to be tested at the police station, and blew a 0.152% and 0.155%, on the breathalyzer.

We were initially worried about this case, before we found that our client had blown into the breath test (Intoxilyzer) several times before the breathalyzer machine printed out the results. We were not given any of the earlier breath machine results, which is mandatory under the GBI Intoxilyzer training manual and Georgia DUI laws. We explained the problem to the prosecutor, who agreed to reduce the DUI to a reckless driving offense. In addition, he allowed our client to mail in the plea without having to return back to Georgia.

Outcome: DUI reduced to reckless driving

Case #15 – Charge Reduced after Fourth Amendment Violation in Doraville Municipal Court

Description: Our client, a young woman, was confronted by a third party in a parking lot for allegedly driving erratically. This person forcibly took the keys from our client before calling the police. When the police arrived, they searched our client’s car and found her prescription medication—violating our client’s Fourth Amendment protection against illegal search and seizure. After administering the field sobriety tests, the police arrested our client for DUI-DRUGS.

We filed a pre-trial motion arguing that our client’s rights were violated. Upon reviewing the video tape evidence, the State decided to reduce our client’s charge to reckless driving, allowing her to avoid the DUI penalties associated with a drunk-driving offense. In Georgia, a DUI-drugs conviction causes a 6 month total loss of driving privileges.

Outcome: DUI reduced to reckless driving

Case #16 – DUI and Child Endangerment in Municipal Court of Atlanta

Description: While on her way to bail her child’s grandfather out of jail, our client—a single mother—was arrested for drunk driving with her child (who was under 14 years of age) in the vehicle. Because this was her second DUI offense, we knew we had to do everything we could to help the client avoid another conviction. Having the child in the vehicle would mean AN ADDITIONAL DUI, so she faced TWO DUI charges in this case. We were able to convince the prosecution that there were some weaknesses in the case in order to get our client’s charges reduced to reckless driving—allowing her to avoid jail time and a driver’s license suspension.

Outcome: DUI and Child Endangerment charges dropped, in exchange for a Reckless Driving guilty plea

Case #17 – Taking Over a DUI Case From Another Criminal Defense Attorney

Description: Our client was previously represented by another DUI attorney, who convinced our client that he wouldn’t have to face the criminal charges as long as he stayed out of Georgia. This advice was both improper and unethical, by the prior DUI lawyer. After two years, our client—who was getting married—decided he needed to handle his pending charge to put his past behind him. Working with our firm on when and how to do this, he surrendered himself to the court and was granted a release on bond pending his trial. The prosecution wanted to make an example of our client by offering a deal that required him to stay in jail for a year. However, we knew this option was not suitable for our client, and took the case to trial—securing a not guilty verdict at trial.

Outcome: Acquittal

Case # 18 – Client Arrested by State Trooper for Third DUI at Municipal Court of Doraville

Description: Our client was arguing with his girlfriend (passenger in the car) while driving when he exited I-285, crossed over all eight lanes of traffic on Buford Highway while going southbound, hit a curb, and then went up the opposite ramp and was pulled over by a Georgia State Trooper. The trooper noticed two cases of beer in the vehicle and obtained an admission from our client that he had just left a nightclub. The trooper asked our client to take an Alco-sensor and horizontal gaze nystagmus, but did not ask him to perform the other standardized field sobriety tests due to the hazardous conditions of traffic on Buford Highway.

Because this was our client’s third DUI in five years, he had to fight his charge or risk significant jail time. During the pre-trial motions, we were able to get our client’s refusal to take the evidentiary breathalyzer test thrown out due to an improper implied consent warning. We were also able to get the Alco-sensor results thrown out as well, due to being administered improperly.

We sought to challenge the trooper’s administration of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test during the bench trial. After undergoing cross examination regarding the test, the trooper testified about our client’s appearance and behavior at the time of arrest, without explaining what the horizontal gaze nystagmus test proved. The trial lasted only 25 minutes before our client was acquitted by the Doraville judge.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI

Case #19 – DUI Roadblock Ruled Illegal at Doraville Municipal Court

Description: The Fourth Amendment controls whether a DUI checkpoint is being legally operated or not. During a DUI checkpoint, local police are required to abide by pre-set roadblock site approval and supervision guidelines. After our client was arrested for drunk driving at a Doraville DUI roadblock, just north of the Oasis Goodtime Club, Mr. Head filed a motion arguing that the roadblock was not established according to existing standards. Although our motion to declare this sobriety checkpoint unconstitutional was granted, the prosecutor appealed the ruling. Fortunately for our client, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld the court’s original ruling and our client’s arrest was deemed illegal.

Outcome: All charges were dismissed due to 4th Amendment violation

Case #20 – Attorney Charged with DUI After Rear Ending Another Vehicle at Fulton County State Court

Description: Our client, an attorney, was driving on I-285 when he rear ended another vehicle. The first officer to the scene believed that our client was under the influence, and administered several field sobriety tests before handcuffing our client. The officer was then joined by a DUI Task Force officer, who had the client step out of the other officer’s car, where the second officer then took off his cuffs, and gave the standardized field sobriety tests to him. The DUI task force officer recorded our client failing the field sobriety tests. Our client also refused to take a blood test, so he refused the implied consent test.

As this was his third DUI offense within five years, the best plea bargain offer from the prosecution included six months in jail. We filed a number of pre-trial motions, resulting in the suppression of the DUI Task Force officer’s video, all of the field sobriety test evidence, as well as any mention of the field sobriety tests and our client’s refusal to take a breath test.

After more than 38 months, the case was finally up for trial. Because almost all of the prosecution’s evidence was eliminated, the DUI charge was dismissed and our client entered a plea of guilty to reckless driving—allowing him to avoid jail time and save his career.

Outcome: DUI charge reduced to reckless driving


Case #21 – Breath Test Results Suppressed in Gwinnett County

Description: Our client was stopped for speeding. The defendant participated in field sobriety tests as instructed. A video showed that the officer did not follow proper protocol in administering the tests and that the client did not consent to taking a breathalizer test at the scene, but was told to do the breath test at the station. The breath test registered aa .092% BAC. When this was pointed out, the Judge in Gwinnett State Court suppressed the breath test results. Our client was able to plea to a reckless driving charge and avoided a jury trial. Our client was able to move on without a DUI on his record.

Outcome: DUI reduced to reckless driving


Case #22 – Motion to Suppress Granted Based on Client Testimony and Lack of Video of Traffic Stop

Description: Our client was pulled over on I-285 for allegedly having blue lights coming from his vehicle, which is illegal in the state of Georgia. Blue lights are only permitted in a passenger car if you are a police officer. Our client worked at Circuit City and was the lead installation technician for people who wanted to add TVs, radios, aesthetic lights, etc to their cars. He testified that the lights in his car were white, not blue and that there was no way that the light could be mistaken for blue. As there was no video of the traffic stop, the judge chose to trust the testimony of the client and determined that the officer was mistaken. The motion to suppress was granted which left the state with no evidence to prosecute our client. All charges were dismissed and the client’s bond money was returned.

Outcome: DUI Dismissed


Case #23 – Officer’s Unclear Testimony Leads to Granted Motion to Suppress and Dismissed DUI Charges

Description: Our client was pulled over for speeding, but was then told that he had to take a field sobriety test or he would spend the night in jail. The client failed the field sobriety tests and then blew a .120% BAC back at the jail. The judge suppressed the field sobriety tests but did not originally suppress the breath test based on the fact that the officer’s testimony was unclear. We spoke with the judge explaining that our client would testify to what occurred since the officer’s testimony was unclear. After hearing what our client was going to say, the judge decided that there was no need for trial and the breath test was suppressed. With both the field sobriety and breath tests suppressed, the prosecution had evidence to move forward. Our client was DUI free and simply had to pay a speeding ticket after all was said and done.

Outcome: DUI Dismissed. Plea to speeding


Case #24 – Key Witness Helps Client Receive Not Guilty Decision on DUI Charges

Description: Our client was pulled over for failure to maintain lane. There was no video of the traffic stop but failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested by the Georgia State Patrol officer. Our client refused the state breath tests at the station. The officer included embellishments of impairment in his testimony including slurred speech, swaying and unsteadiness. This case would have been not been a win except for the witness which was presented by the client. The client was hanging out at a Rockdale County Police officer’s home earlier that evening. This officer had great credentials including being certified to give breath tests. The Rockdale officer’s testimony weighed heavily against the arresting officer’s exaggerated testimony and our client was found not guilty of DUI.

Outcome: Not Guilty

Case #25 – Suppressed Breath Test and Lack of Testing of Substance Leads to No Guilty Verdict of DUI and Marijuana Possession

Description: Our client was pulled over for crossing the gore on a highway. When the officer approached the vehicle, they observed majiruana smoke coming from the car. The officer then noticed marijuana on the floorboard. Our client agreed to a breath test which registered a .115% BAC. Because the client had a marijuana charge, the officer would not agree to reduce the case to a reckless driving. At trial, there was no evidence that the substance in the car was tested and found to be marijuana. The marijuana charge was dismissed and since the breath test was also thrown out during trial, the client was found not guilty of DUI.

Outcome: Not Guilty of DUI and Marijuana charge dismissed

Case #26 – Circus Animal Cruelty Case

Description: Our client was an elephant trainer who was accused of putting a bullhook into an elephant’s mouth – he was charged with animal cruelty. A loss in this case would have cost our client his job. The main opposing witness was an animal control officer and veterinarian who refused to speak with me before trial. Evidence did not corroborate this witness’s testimony. We provided medical evidence and video evidence to contradict the state’s witness. In the end, the verdict was in the client’s favor.

Outcome: Not guilty

Case #27 – Superior Court Overturns Probate Court’s Decision on Legality of Roadblock

Description: Our client came upon a roadblock on Memorial Day weekend. She did not show significant signs of impairment during field sobriety tests, but was still arrested. She blew a .111% BAC. At the Probate Court level we argued that the state was not able to prove that the roadblock was set up legally in accordance to the Fourth Amendment. The judge in the Probate Court convicted our client. Not satisfied, I filed a memorandum to the Superior Court with regards to the judge’s decision based on the evidence provided of the legality of the roadblock. The Superior Court judge agreed and reversed the trial court’s decision. Our client was able to get the DUI removed from her record.

Outcome: Not guilty following an appeal to the Superior Court

Case #28 – Man with Suspended Drivers License Charged with DUI

Description: Our client was on probation for a DUI and had a suspended driver’s license. A police officer found him drunk and sleeping in the back seat. He claimed that his car had run out of gas and admitted to driving the car to the scene. He refused field sobriety tests but submitted to a breath test which registered a .254% BAC. This case went to trial. I continued to try to negotiate a deal throughout the trial process. The state was not able to present valid evidence of a suspended license or signs of impairment. During closing argument when the state saw that the trial was not going in their favor, we reached an agreement. While found guilty of not having  a license on person, the DUI and suspended license charges were dropped.

Outcome: Negotiation during closing argument of trial: guilty of not having a license on person but DUI and suspended license charges were dismissed

Case #29 – Court Rules No Lawful Basis for Stop – DUI Charges Dismissed

Description: Our client was stopped for squealing his tires at a busy intersection. At the Administrative Hearing, the arresting officers claimed that our client turned in an aggressive manner. At a hearing a couple months later the same officer claimed that the client almost lost control of his car. With inconsistent statements and video footage of the event, the state was unable to prove that there was a lawful basis to stop my client. As such, all evidence (poor field sobriety tests and .16% BAC) was suppressed and the case was dismissed.

Outcome: Motion to supress granted and case dismissed


Case #30 – Extensive Testimony on Breath Tests Results in Not Guilty Verdict for DUI Charge

Description: Our client was in the area for a business trip and made an illegal U-turn. An officer pulled him over and conducted field sobriety tests. The client failed the field sobriety tests and blew a .122% BAC. The client’s career was on the line in this case. We pointed out inconsistencies in the officer’s testimony and  problems with the breath tests through the arresting officer’s testimony as well as expert testimony. Our client was found not guilty and was able to keep his job.

Outcome: Not guilty on all accounts of DUI

Case #31 – Questionable Traffic Stop Gets Reduced from DUI to Reckless Driving

Description: Our client pulled into a closed child care center at 2:00 AM and was pulled over. The client failed field sobriety tests and blew a .156% BAC at the station. After several hearings, legal memorandums and motions to suppress, the state offered a reckless driving charge.

Outcome: Charges reduced to reckless driving after motion hearing

Case #32 – Underage DUI Dismissed

Description: Our client was under the age of 21, a college student and the incident took place the night before he was leaving for the national guard. the clients car ran off the road into the bushes. He left the scene and returned with his mother. At that point there were officers on the scene. A breath test was taken and resulted in a .061% BAC. This case was set for trial. The day before the trial, the state granted the mother of the client a sit down. The arresting officer in the case had also recently had a questionable run in with the prosecuting attorney on this case. As such, the prosecutor weighed the mother’s statements heavier and agreed to allow the client to plea to too fast for conditions and dismissed the possession by a minor and DUI charges.

Outcome: DUI dismissed and plea to too fast for conditions


Case #33 – DUI Reduced to Reckless Driving on Technicality of Arresting Officer Not Following Training Protocol

Description: Our client was charged with having an unlawful alochol level in his body. He had been involved in an accident and also vomitted serveral times. This case originally went to trial. During trial we pointed out that it training mandated that a defendant’s mouth must be rinsed after vomiting before taking a breath test. Before a ruling could be made in the trial, the arresting officer agreed to reduce the case to a reckless driving charge.

Outcome: Reduced to reckless driving

Case #34 – Driver Passed Out in Car on Wrong Side of The Road Found Not Guilty of DUI

Description: My client was out celebrating her birthday. That night she was found passed out in the driver’s seat in a car parked on the wrong side of the road. When police officers arrived, they knocked on the window to wake the client. The client held that she did not drive the car. Her husband admitted to and testified that he drove the car and left his wife on the road in the car after an argument that evening. With this testimony, the state was not able to prove that the client drove the car. She was found not guilty.

Outcome: Not guilty on all counts

Case #35 – Man with .110% BAC Gets into Accident and Found Not Guilty of DUI

Description: My client lost control of his vehicle and was involved in a car accident. The vehicle’s trajectory and impact caused the airbags to deploy. Police stated that the client had slurred speech, bloodshot eyes and was dazed. He blew a .110% BAC back at the station. This  case went to trial. We suggested that the signs of being under the influence were also consistent with having been in an accident where an airbag deployed. We further had an expert witness testify that the breath test results could have been in error based on the substances that were in the airbag.

Outcome: Not guilty of DUI but guilty of failure to maintain lane

Case #36 – Unlawful Roadblock Leads to DUI being Dismissed

Description: The client in this case has a history of DUI charges. He was stopped at a roadblock which I learned was set up to stop all people living inside a neighborhood cul-de-sac. A motion to suppress was granted as the state was unable to prove that the roadblock was lawful. All evidence stemmed from the traffic stop was suppressed and the client was free of the DUI charge.

Outcome: DUI dismissed

Case #37 – Man Sleeping in Car on Side of Road Charged with DUI and Found Not Guilty

Description: My client was found slumped over his steering wheel in a car on the side of the road. When the officer arrived her vomitted on his shoes. The client was charged with DUI. A witness testified that she drove the client to this location. Our defense was that the client did not, in fact, drive the car. The state was not able to prove otherwise and the judge found my client not guilty.

Outcome: Not guilty

Case #38 – DUI Reduced to Reckless Driving Based on Improper HGN and Consent to State Test

Description: Despite driving on the median, having slurred speech and failing other dexterity tests, my client’s DUI charge was reduced to reckless driving due to the arresting officer’s testimony. The officer could not properly explain how he performed the HGN and could not state for sure if the client had agreed to the State test. Based on this testimony, the state agreed to reduce the charge in this case.

Outcome: DUI reduced to reckless driving


Case #39 – Woman Rear Ends Cop and Gets DUI Charge Dismissed

Description: My client rear ended a police officer. The police officer called a second officer to check my client for DUI. She was given field sobriety tests and read the implied consent at that time. The client refused the state test. The officer testified that my client was read the implied consent again at the state and then agreed to the State test. Before this testimony I found out that this was false – the implied consent was not read again at the station. The officer committed perjury and the state’s second witness would confirm this. The prosecutor on the case spoke with his second witness in private and came back to offer he would drop the DUI if my client would plead to following too close and pay a fine. My client happily accepted this offer.

Outcome: DUI dismissed and charged with following too close

Case #40 – Man Found Passed out in Car in Bar Parking Lot – Found Not Guilty of DUI

Description: My client was found passed out in his car with the engine running in a parking lot of a bar. An officer found my client there as he was the only car in the parking lot since the bar had closed. My client failed the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He also failed a breath test at the station. This moved forward to trial. At the trial my client provided a receipt which showed he purchased food and drink at the bar at a certain time and then testified that he was too drunk to drive so he went to his car to sleep. The state was not able to prove that he operated the vehicle at any point under the influence and he was found not guilty of DUI.

Outcome: Not guilty of DUI