Georgia Criminal Defense Statewide handling of Criminal and DUI/DWI cases Free DUI Case Evaluation
Head Thomas Webb & Willis, Atlanta Attorneys
         HOME
 


Lawyers file suit to allow testimony


BY BEN CRITES, The Island Packet
Published Friday, September 15, 2006

Three Columbia lawyers have filed a lawsuit to wipe out a requirement that 14th Judicial Circuit Solicitor Duffie Stone says threatens numerous Beaufort County criminal cases that rely on testimony from out-of-state doctors.

The suit was filed against the state Board of Medical Examiners on Sept. 8 in response to legislation requiring out-of-state doctors to obtain a $75 temporary South Carolina medical license to provide expert testimony in court.

The law, passed in June by the General Assembly, also created stricter requirements to obtain documents from out-of-state physicians.

Filed on behalf of 36 South Carolinians involved in medical malpractice or workman's compensation litigation, the suit argues that the law violates "state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection, due process and free speech," among other violations.

"Ultimately, what we're saying is fundamental rights are at stake when you start saying a person who is licensed in good faith in another state would have to have a license here and essentially be taxed to give testimony in a court," said Charles Henshaw Jr., one of the three lawyers who filed the suit.

The lawyers have filed a petition asking that the Supreme Court rule directly on the lawsuit, preventing the litigation from first going through lower courts. The other two lawyers are W. Allen Nickels III and John S. Nichols.

So far, the Supreme Court appears to be on their side. On Aug. 24, all five justices signed a ruling that halted the law's enforcement. Their ruling said, "The effect of the revised statutes has the potential to substantially impair the orderly administration of justice."

Dr. Louie Costa, vice president of the S.C. Board of Medical Examiners, which is in charge of medical licensing, said the board will meet this morning to discuss its reply to the lawsuit and won't comment until then.

But Costa has said the law's intent was accountability, and the licensing requirement wouldn't provide an unnecessary burden that would keep out-of-state doctors from testifying. The temporary licenses can be produced within 24 hours, he has said, and the cost likely would be covered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff's attorney or a defense firm.

"Right now we have no jurisdiction, enforcement or disciplinary action for testimony from witnesses that is injurious or malicious," Costa has said.

But Stone, whose circuit includes Beaufort and Jasper counties, said the licensing requirement would have been detrimental to many cases his office tries. That's because many victims of violent crimes in southern Beaufort County are transported across state lines to Memorial Health University Medi-cal Center in Savannah, the closest hospital with a Level 1 trauma unit.

The cases involving those people often are dependent on testimony from the doctors who treated the victims. And more often than not, those doctors are licensed in Georgia.

"With any assault or felony DUI case, how do you prove serious bodily injury? You put the doctor on the stand," Stone has said. As to the suit filed by the Columbia lawyers, he said, "I'll offer any help I can give them."

Another solicitor in the same situation is Donald V. Myers, who is in charge of the judicial circuit that includes Edgefield, McCormick and Saluda counties. In an affidavit included in the lawsuit, Myers said the law, known as Act 385, presented "extreme hurdles" during a felony trial involving a 3-month-old baby with head injuries.

"When we called the main witness, an out-of-state pediatric neurosurgeon, to testify to the injuries ... the defendant objected based on Act 385," Myers wrote. "Act 385 will present major barriers. ... Justice will be denied, and an injustice will be perpetrated on innocent victims."

Henshaw said it's ultimately an issue of constitutionality.

"People have a right to come into court and express themselves freely," he said. "There shouldn't be anything that prevents that."

Article courtesy of http://www.islandpacket.com/.

 

 

William C. (Bubba) Head, DUI Attorney, Trial Lawyer Atlanta, Georgia, Criminal Defense Attorneys
William C. Head, Senior Partner
First Name:  
Last Name:
Email*:
Phone:
Comments:

 

About Us
Our Fees
Contact Us
Free Case Evaluation
Resources
Site Map


Drunk Driving Offenses and Information

Georgia DUI Definitions
Georgia DUI Laws
Administrative License Suspension
Field Sobriety Test
Blood Alcohol Calculator
Frequently Asked Questions
DUI Case Examples
DMV & Drivers License Information
Georgia's Breath Machine - The Intoxilyzer 5000


Criminal Offenses
Speeding Tickets
Motor Vehicle Offenses
Publications & Articles
Non-violent Crimes
Property Crimes
Theft Crimes
Drug Related Crimes
Sex Crimes
Violent Crimes




 


Cities, Counties, and Zip codes that we service:

Atlanta Georgia DUI-DWI - Home | Free Case Evaluation | Atlanta DUI | Georgia Drunk Driving Laws
Criminal Attorney Georgia | Georgia DUI Attorney | Criminal Lawyer Atlanta | DUI In Atlanta
Atlanta Drunk Driving | DUI Lawyer Georgia | DUI Lawyer Atlanta | GA DUI Attorney | Drunk Driving Georgia
DUI Attorney in Georgia | Drivers License Georgia | GA DUI Driving Under the Influence
Traffic Tickets Georgia | Boating Under the Influence (BUI) & Vehicular Homicide
Non-Violent Crimes | Property Crimes | Theft Crimes | Driving Under the Influence of Drugs
Sex Crimes | Violent Crimes | Publications & Articles | Other Informational DUI Related Websites



© 2007 - 2008 Head Thomas Webb & Willis LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy

Attorney Marketing by: Electric Lemonade